Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, Syed Deedar Hussain Shah and Javed Iqbal, JJ Summary: This case involves a civil petition for special leave to appeal filed by Shamas-ul-Bahadur (petitioner) against the judgment of the N.-W.F.P. Service Tribunal. The Tribunal had accepted the appeal of Nisar Ahmed (respondent No. 1) and

Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, C.J., Mian Muhammad Ajmal and Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi, JJ Summary: This case involved appeals concerning the striking off of the defense of Westinghouse Electric Corporation (respondents) and the subsequent decreeing of a suit filed by WAK Orient Power and Light Limited (appellant). WAK Orient had

Sitting Panel: Ajmal Mian, C.J., Sh. Riaz Ahmed and Ch. Muhammad Arif, JJ Summary: This consolidated set of 8 appeals and 106 petitions for leave to appeal primarily challenged the Lahore and Sindh High Courts’ decisions that interim prohibitory orders (especially concerning assessment and collection of public revenues) had expired

Sitting Panel: Saiduzzaman Siddiqui, C.J., Munawar Ahmed Mirza, and Sh. Riaz Ahmed, JJ Summary:In this case, the petitioner Muhammad Yaqoob challenged the judgment of the Balochistan High Court, which had upheld a decree passed by the Majlis-i-Shoora granting possession through pre-emption to Khair Muhammad. The core dispute centered on whether

Sitting Panel: Abdur Rehman Khan and Sh. Riaz Ahmed, JJ Summary: This case involves petitions filed by the Federation of Pakistan against the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, which allowed the appeals of Saleemullah Khan (respondent) and ordered his reinstatement in service with full back benefits. Saleemullah Khan, a

Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, Munir A. Sheikh and Rashid Aziz Khan, JJ Summary: This case details a criminal petition filed by Muhammad Sharif and Raza Hussain seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench. The High Court had upheld their conviction and death

Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, Rana Bhagwandas and Mian Muhammad Ajmal, JJ Summary: This case involves an appeal by Muhammad Akram Khan against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, which confirmed his death sentence for the murder of Niaz Muhammad. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, armed with a

Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, Rashid Aziz Khan and Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, JJ Summary: This case involves an appeal by Qutab-ud-Din against the Lahore High Court’s judgment, which maintained his conviction and life imprisonment for the murder of Pervaiz under Section 302(b)/34 of the Penal Code. The prosecution’s case was

Sitting Panel: Sh. Riaz Ahmed, Rashid Aziz Khan and Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, JJ 1 Summary: This case involves an appeal filed by Muhammad Mushtaq against the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, which confirmed his conviction and death sentence under Section 302, P.P.C., along with convictions under Sections