The President’s Power to Commute Death Sentences Before Sh. Riaz Ahmad, Raja Afrasiab Khan and Malik Muhammad Qayyum, JJ This case, decided on January 14, 1992 , addresses the powers of the President of Pakistan to commute death sentences, particularly in light of the insertion of Article 2-A into the

Evidence Assessment in a Double Murder: Differential Treatment of Co-Accused Panel: Fazal Karim and Riaz Ahmad, JJ. This case, Criminal Appeal No. 44 of 1984 and Murder Reference No. 91 of 1984, decided on October 20, 1987, involved Faiz Muhammad and Sawan as Appellants against The State as the Respondent.

Defining “Default” in Rent Payment and Tenant Protections Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This case, Writ Petition No. 5577/B of 1987, decided on August 25, 1987, involved Abdul Hamid and another as Petitioners against Muhammad Rafiq Chaudhry and 2 others as Respondents. The primary issue before the court was the interpretation

Appreciation of Evidence, Related Witnesses, and Triple Murder Conviction Panel: Rustam S. Sidhwa and Riaz Ahmad, JJ. This case, Criminal Appeal No. 148 and Murder Reference No. 76 of 1983, heard on December 13, 1986, involved Inayat as the Appellant against The State as the Respondent. The key legal issues

Cancellation of Pre-Arrest Bail Due to Improper Judicial Discretion Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This case, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2903/8 of 1986, decided on December 16, 1986, involved Muhammad Yaqub as the Petitioner against Muhammad Ramzan and another as Respondents. The central issue was the cancellation of pre-arrest bail granted by

Court’s Duty in Framing Issues and Pre-Emption Rights Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This case, Civil Revision No. 2077-D of 1986, decided on November 10, 1986, involved Muhammad Saeed as the Petitioner against Muhammad Urfan and another as Respondents. The primary issues addressed were the duty of the court in framing

Evaluating Accomplice and Approver Testimony in Murder Prosecutions Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This criminal appeal, No. 473 of 1985, decided on July 9, 1986, involved Tariq and others as Appellants against The State as the Respondent. The core legal issues revolved around the interpretation of an “approver” and “accomplice” under

alidity of Gift Under Muhammadan Law and Rebuttal of Revenue Records Panel: Manzoor Hussain Sial and Riaz Ahmad, JJ. This case, Regular First Appeal No. 11 of 1968/BWP, decided on March 24, 1986, involved Mst. Ghulam Sughran and others as Appellants against Sahibzada Ijaz Hussain and others as Respondents. The

Bail Principles in Murder Cases: “Further Inquiry” and Vicarious Liability Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This case, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3318/B of 1984, decided on December 9, 1984, involves Nawab Khan and another as Petitioners against The State as the Respondent. The petitioners were represented by Dr. Khalid Ranjha and Muhammad

Principles Governing Pre-Arrest Bail and Misuse of Process Panel: Riaz Ahmad, J. This case, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1142/B of 1984, heard on May 21, 1984, involves Arif Mutin Bhutta as the Petitioner against The State as the Respondent. The primary subject of the case is the requirements for the grant